<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Members Only</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardkong.com/2007/12/members-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardkong.com/2007/12/members-only/</link>
	<description>a fascinating site that is almost entirely accurate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: admiral_acbkar</title>
		<link>http://www.richardkong.com/2007/12/members-only/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>admiral_acbkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongtemplation.com/2007/12/21/members-only/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>We are required to call our users &#039;customers.&#039;  I assume this is so we can focus on so-called &#039;customer service.&#039;  It is interesting to me though how our uh, customers, use retail terminology to refer to our collection and services. Like they say &#039;do you have this in stock&#039; or &#039;can you order it for me&#039;  It&#039;s weird.  There was some talk about whether libraries are/can/should compete with bookstores a few years ago, and this just seems like another salvo fired in that battle (if you believe there&#039;s one)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are required to call our users &#8216;customers.&#8217;  I assume this is so we can focus on so-called &#8216;customer service.&#8217;  It is interesting to me though how our uh, customers, use retail terminology to refer to our collection and services. Like they say &#8216;do you have this in stock&#8217; or &#8216;can you order it for me&#8217;  It&#8217;s weird.  There was some talk about whether libraries are/can/should compete with bookstores a few years ago, and this just seems like another salvo fired in that battle (if you believe there&#8217;s one)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel so</title>
		<link>http://www.richardkong.com/2007/12/members-only/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel so</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongtemplation.com/2007/12/21/members-only/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Rich -- I like the idea of being called a &quot;member&quot; -- especially since the library is such an important resource to the community.  Sort of like NPR; don&#039;t they call people members also?  And you&#039;re not even asking for money during fund drives!

I&#039;m almost positive some of my youth group students have the exact Members Only jacket you included in this post.  Of all the trends to make a comeback, it had to be Members Only and ridiculously tight jeans.  Maybe they&#039;ll start pinning them next...

We hope your family had a very merry Christmas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich &#8212; I like the idea of being called a &#8220;member&#8221; &#8212; especially since the library is such an important resource to the community.  Sort of like NPR; don&#8217;t they call people members also?  And you&#8217;re not even asking for money during fund drives!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m almost positive some of my youth group students have the exact Members Only jacket you included in this post.  Of all the trends to make a comeback, it had to be Members Only and ridiculously tight jeans.  Maybe they&#8217;ll start pinning them next&#8230;</p>
<p>We hope your family had a very merry Christmas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bleuemoon</title>
		<link>http://www.richardkong.com/2007/12/members-only/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>bleuemoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 04:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kongtemplation.com/2007/12/21/members-only/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>i usually use the term &quot;patron.&quot;  client seems too commercial or something.  but how is the &quot;patron,&quot; namely people librarians serve, a patron?  is it by virtue of using the services that the library offers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i usually use the term &#8220;patron.&#8221;  client seems too commercial or something.  but how is the &#8220;patron,&#8221; namely people librarians serve, a patron?  is it by virtue of using the services that the library offers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

